Friday, December 20, 2013

The Walking Dead, a Horticultural Lament

Beefs with Walking Dead



I’ve been pretty impressed by the responses I have received for my blog re: the whole Duck Dynasty / Phil Robertson blow up.  So, I figured I would throw another one out there which focuses on a popular TV show, from my own, very personal perspective. 
One of my favorite shows of the past few years is The Walking Dead.  Yes, it is a tired premise.  The zombie motif hasn’t been the same since Zombieland.  Those guys just nailed it.  The dystopian genre, among my favorites, should not be limited to the undead, as there are many, very well done shows about the apocalypse (check out the BBC’s Survivors). 
Regardless, The Walking Dead has garnered a huge following.  Bottom line is it is a pretty good show.  I like the premise and the cast’s relationships which have developed thus far.  Now in its 5th season for those with cable, I’m a little behind the times with seeing the 4th season, free and streaming, on pollystreaming.com. 
With the first few episodes, several personal peeves surfaced, peeves which had percolated throughout the previous seasons.  However, I can put those peeves aside and suspend disbelief enough to deeply enjoy the show.  However, again, these peeves cannot go unaddressed.  Secretly, I wish for a job as a continuity editor on such a show, so this could serve as a brief C.V.
Season 4 finds our heroes and heroines holed up in a prison.  As with the preceding episodes, it takes place in the south, apparently in Georgia.  My elation that a big budget show would take on filming in the South is hard to contain.  The native vegetation seen on screen enhances the authenticity of this.  I am so glad to see a show that isn’t obviously filmed in the west.
Many episodes show the characters out in the woods.  Daryl is a product of this back woods, bred in the wild characters.  Hershel, with his agrarian background, small town vet persona, is perfect and does not betray his authenticity through his accent.  Rick, the key figure, is convincingly died in the wool good ole boy.
Herein lie my grievances.  Some of these gripes originate long before Season 4, but, as I am currently working to beef up my blog, and could not take it anymore, I am speaking out.  There is no excuse for these flubs.
First, let us examine Hershel’s collection of Elderberry with the intent of treating those infected with a strange leap from bite infections to some other vector.  Elderberry has been known for centuries as having antioxidant, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties.    His premise is that this is a natural, readily available herb which could hold off the rampant contagion turning healthy folk into zombies, without the previously isolated case of bites.
All of this makes perfect sense to me.  During a working summer in an English garden, my cottage was visited by some Travelers wishing to harvest the prolific berries of the 20’ tall Elderberry in my backyard.  Sure, why not.  The Travelers were a demographic I could relate to, having spent several years deeply enamored with the Grateful Dead.  These folks were basically a travelling parking lot event, living the dream.
The huge drupes of fruit were there for the taking.  The Travelers offered to cook me supper and libation in return for the favor.  Their goal was to collect the fruit with which to make medicinal concoctions and juice.  The flowers were also prized earlier in the season.  Quickly, they set up orchard ladders and harvested a ridiculous amount of fruit; snip, snip, dropping fruiting heads 8” across into their bags.
So, Hershel goes into the obviously Oak / Hickory forest and begins harvesting plants, making it known his intent.  The problem is two fold: 1)  The plants he was harvesting were undeniably recently planted.  Their crowns were above ground and they were arranged in a most unnatural way, and incredibly uniform.  2)  The harvested plants were far from being Elderberry.  Elderberry has a palmate leaf (I think that is the term) whereas this plant had a simple ovate leaf.  Busted.
Next faux pa was with some cover applied to the set.  Often, to give the atmosphere of overgrown, loads of viney plants are placed around the set.  In one segment, Tyreese, Daryl, and Michonne  go to town, hoping to harvest some pharmaceuticals  and whatever else worthwhile can be salvaged with the hope of saving their ailing friends.  In the process, they hack their way through loads of vegetation to access a vehicle.
Here’s the rub:  the vines they are hacking, which are a very prominent part of our southern proliferation, are very visibly without life support.  By this, I mean that it is obvious the vines, stretching from ground level into the trees tens of yards above, are blatantly beyond life.   The leaves are withered or scorched, perfect testaments to having been cut, placed, and subjected to too much heat and lack of water. 
Then, here comes a biggie, one which always annoys me across the board of post-apocalyptic shows, is the height of the grass. In every example I have seen, the grass has been cut within the last month.  With The Walking Dead, let us assume society collapsed at least 2 years before Season 4 debuted. 
This past year, I injured my hip in February, had surgery in May, and have been lame since the beginning.  Only through the good will of friends did I get my grass cut this season.  The first cut was chest high with a brush mower, which struggled with the volume of grass.  After that, two cuts with a heavy duty riding mower were required before one could even saunter out to the back garden.  There is no way in hell grass could be kept at the height shown without regular maintenance. 
Then there is Carol and Rick’s venture into a subdivision to reconnoiter supplies.  Along their way, they discover some other survivors who have made do with the natural bounty available.  Carol and Rick go out foraging and stumble upon a great harvest of tomatoes. Summertime in Georgia, what could be more natural than ripe tomatoes?
Let’s look at the tomato.  First, it is an annual.  This means one must plant it every year to yield a plant and fruit.  Of course, tomatoes are notorious for self-seeding, planting themselves wherever ripe fruit set seed.  I have grown self-sown toms, loved the random results, and not  paid much attention.  What bugged me about these plants is they were perfectly staked, with an assumed period of neglect.
Tomatoes require constant attention in their growing life.  They will quickly shoot up to 6’or 9’.  To produce good fruit, one must monitor and manage this.  Such was not the case in this episode.  Wondering through an urban wasteland, our compatriots discover multiple, perfect tomato plants and harvest bags full.
Last, but by no means least, there is the choice of material for reinforcing the perimeter fence securing the prison from the beasties.  As the hordes of undead pressed against this defense, the fence began to give way.  Huge walls of chain link fence, bolstered by steel poles set in the ground, and topped with razor wire, began to fall.  Here, we have a very existential threat.
Of course, this was not a total surprise.  Everyone could see it coming, including the characters.  They took proactive action by placing poles to reinforce the actual fence.  Unfortunately, they once again made a strategic mistake.  They used pine poles.
Pine is good wood, if you want a bazillion 2x4s or other dimensional lumber.  If you are fighting zombies, I would highly recommend going with something with less flex and a longer life span when exposed to the elements.  It’s Georgia.  Cedars are not a scarce commodity.  They last forever.
Dear Reader, thank you for sticking with me through this rant.

Thursday, December 19, 2013

Duck Dynasty Delimma and Why It Matters to Me



December 19, 2013
Sooo….Duck Dynasty’s patriarch, Phil Robertson made some remarks in a GQ magazine interview where he expressed his fundamental / evangelical Christian views regarding homosexuals, as per his interpretation of the Bible.  In response, A&E (a subset of Hearst and Disney corporations) put him on an indefinite probation from the show.  The issue has overwhelmed the internet.  Fully half of my Facebook feed is full of such, with some posts surprising me in their rigidity and origin.
Before going any further, my biases need explanation, especially as these biases have me confounded on what to think about the hooha.  This is not to say I think the whole blow up really deserves the attention it is getting.  Why I think that will be explained below.
Above all, I think celebrity worship is just plain silly.  Granted, sometimes when celebrity becomes a lightning rod for real issues, speaking out, or seriously considering one’s stance, it is important.  This is one of those instances.
In regards to my feelings on homosexuality, I really don’t feel one way the other about it, especially in regards to right or wrong.  Judge not, the shortest chapter in the Bible, is one foundation of my personal religious views.  I have known several people who either knew they were gay for a long time, and others who later discovered, realized, or came out about their sexuality, never feeling threatened or imposed upon by their orientation.  
In the former category, I could point to one gentleman who I worked with previously.  He is a wonderful man, probably 10 years my senior, who I would like to count as a good friend from that epoch of my life.  His sexuality was never an issue, an obstacle, or uncomfortable in regards to our friendship.  Beyond that, he was very OK with educating this naïve small town boy about issues regarding homosexuality.  For context, this was 1990 + Atlanta where a large homosexual population existed during the peak horror of the AIDS plague. 
In the latter category, several women I know realized their sexuality after we had active relations.  During college days, I was head over heels in love with several women who later came out.  In one case in particular, I made substantial life decisions to enhance the potential for a relationship.  With others, as early as high school, I enjoyed an active boyfriend / girlfriend relationship, a random make out session, or a pining hard core crush, only to learn later in life that they had come to their personal truth and I was no longer in the pool of candidates for their affection.  Despite this bummer, they still have my respect and friendship, if not longing thoughts about romance.
My 10 year old son and I are huge fans of Duck Dynasty.  We watch a lot of videos when we are together, especially since I had a hip injury followed by surgery and have been pretty much lame since last February.  I have pretty rigorous criteria for what we watch, be it movies, YouTube videos, or TV shows. 
First, there is entertainment value for both of us.   There needs to be some greater redeeming value.  Examples of this are valuable video experiences which I impose (Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid most recently), talking cat videos, or shows which have something to teach respectively.  The last category is best exemplified by Mythbusters which discretely inserts proper scientific inquiry into good fun.  This category shows him experiences he might otherwise miss, expose him to possible career ideas (Making the Cut comes to mind as he has thought about Secret Service / Spy / Special Ops jobs, as most little boys do).  Good fun, good clean fun, is the overriding, basic qualification. 
Duck Dynasty largely satisfies these criteria.  We both enjoy the largely innocuous show.  The Robertson clan is very funny, often witty, and offers insight into another lifestyle’s detail.  We have shared laughs which had us doubled up while watching. 
My son has fallen in love with shooting and guns over the past few years, often badgering me for an opportunity to go hunting for squirrel and even deer.  Recently, Phil was shown gutting a catfish with his very queasy young granddaughters.  I believe this was my son’s first exposure to the necessary gore inherent in processing game.  Having hunted quite a bit in the past, the ethos of eat what you kill is a core belief.  This obviously entails having the fortitude to clean your kill.  I asked my son if he could gut an animal.  He shivered and said absolutely not.  Good life lesson, good argument for the next time he wants to go hunt.  There is no catch and release when you shoot something as opposed to hook something. 
I have known many Robertson-esque people in my life, some of whom are much loved, very large influences on both my son and me.  I relish their interactions with both of us.  When in high school, in rural Kentucky, kids were given a free pass to skip class twice a year:  during tobacco harvest, when the family income depended on their help, and the opening of deer season, when the family larder depended on their help.
Going deeper into personal beliefs, I have long believed the “of the earth” folks are more valuable now than ever before and have more to teach our modernized, tech dependent society in invaluable ways.  I tried to gear my life in that direction for several decades, only to learn the uncomfortable challenges which that way of life dictates, what it means to live that close to the bone or depend on the bounty of nature to support one.
I believe all of us in modern America could learn some very valuable lessons from the Robertsons.  Beyond the above, such would include entrepreneurship, dealing with hard times, life in a family business (another dashed hope of mine), and what the deep south or rural America is about.
The Robertsons, for better or worse, do not pull any punches.  You see what they are genuinely about with every show.  From beheading ducks in front of an elementary school class to Phil’s frequent appearances on the pulpit.  In other words, you get what you pay for.  I don’t feel they are pushing anything beyond the importance of being a redneck over being a yuppie, the importance of educating the younger generations about the same, and the requirement that one should be able to pee off the front porch without consequences.  It is what it is.
I have known, do know, and value knowing many who are fairly rigid in their religious belief, be it Christian, Buddhist, Jewish or Muslim.  I don’t feel the need to challenge them in their beliefs, nor do I feel the need to accept their views as the gospel.   Under no circumstances do I appreciate having one’s views forced upon me, regardless of those views’ political, religious, cosmological or whatever connotations.  I have found that I can see beyond the motivation to convert and accept and love those doing the converting.
As an aside, several times in my life I have opened my door and welcomed into my home proselytizers, mainly of the Church of the Latter Day Saints missionary bent.  Once, this was a devious, you asked for it way.  Two young Mormons showed up at my door mid-morning, about 10 am.  The visit was during the annual three day run for the Grateful Dead in Atlanta, circa 1991.   As the front yard would attest, full of bumper sticker covered microbuses and ratty cars, the house was full of sleeping dead heads, about 40 of them, scattered on couches and the floor.
When the fresh faced chaps knocked on the door, and I was the only person fully conscious at the time, I thought it would be a mutually educational experience to invite them in.  As is my experience with missionaries, they weren’t forcing anything on me, but giving me an opportunity to be educated.  From my hospitality, they got the same.  Beer cans and other detritus from a party which only ended a couple hours before, bleary eyed roommates and guests beginning to stir, surely made an impression.  I got a free Book of Mormon, and a couple others joined us on the couches in the living room for parts of the visit.  After they left, hoots and hollers resounded through the house, those of us experiencing it howling at the perceived impact on the fresh young fellows, those just rousing wondering what the hell just happened.
Bottom line – I respect these guys who wonder all over the planet to espouse their beliefs, regardless of how annoying I selfishly felt their intrusion.  In the multiple encounters I have had with missionaries, they have, to a man, not said you will burn for eternity if you don’t follow our dogma.  They are there to share and educate, fulfill their religious dictates, from my experience.  They operate on the presumption that what they are doing is a “low kill” proposition, few converts will emerge, but their job is to keep on keeping on in step with their beliefs. 
So, to the crux of the issue, Phil Robertson vs A&E.  This bit will most likely be less verbose than the preliminary groundwork.  On the one hand, there is Phil, a self-confessed Bible thumper, espousing his thoughts on homosexuality.  On the other hand, there is A&E distancing themselves from these divisive comments.  Each is standing by what they believe to be the right thing.
This dilemma has several tangents.  Personal / corporate belief, constitutional rights (free speech, religious freedom), and commercial viability come to mind.  I will address these in no particular order.
The First Amendment:  “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” (Wikipedia).  Ergo, Phil and GQ had every latitude in delving into the subject.
Capitalism dictates placating those who pay the bills.  In regard to the network, they must cover their asses as to where those ever important advertising dollars come from.  This nugget of functionality requires action.
Here, I will opine.  Both parties had the right to act as they did, with the caveat of “at your own peril”.  For Phil, repercussions were obvious.  He is a celebrity.  Anything that comes out of his mouth is going viral.  For A&E, they must, first and foremost, as big business, ensure income and thus fear the implications.  I will withhold opinion on the legitimacy of the LBGT community’s complaints, they are free to fight as hard as they can afford to.
As things go, I think A&E will get the short stick.  The advertisers may fall lock step behind the network’s actions.  The big however is A&E sure as hell knew what they were getting into.  The Robertson’s faith, and other philosophies, is front and center.  If the network airs bits of Phil’s sermons as a part of the show, extrapolating his personal beliefs isn’t rocket science.  Therefore, the network should have seen it coming. 
What is the potential outcome?  My gut says a great deal, if not the majority; of the Duck Dynasty fans appreciate the Robertson’s lifestyle and beliefs.  That is why they watch.  The most popular reality TV show ever is largely buttressed by these lifestyle and belief issues.  Bottom line – A&E is going to see an enormous backlash from viewers and will have to reconcile this with advertisers’ input.  This doesn’t even consider the reaction from the rest of the Robertson clan and the viability of the show.
In sum, I really don’t think either party is in the wrong, entirely.  I do think Phil was frank and sincere, and forthcoming in his acceptance and lack of judgment of others, despite his personal convictions.  A&E is covering their corporate ass, with no concern for the greater philosophically significant aspects of the situation.  14 million viewers, and huge swaths of America, cannot be ignored or suppressed, regardless of a divergence in opinion.
My bet is A&E will lose the Robertsons or, at least, this battle.  The Duck Dynasty will continue whether or not on the network.  I vote for personal conviction over corporate paranoia, despite my support and empathy for the LGBT community or my questioning of the Bible as the true word of God.

see also:
http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2013/12/19/255430555/duck-and-cover-what-exactly-is-the-point
 http://benswann.com/michael-lotfi-duck-commander-phil-robertsons-first-amendment-rights-violated/

update:  duck commander (the robertson family) responds - http://duckcommander.com/news/robertson-family-offical-statement#.UrOnrAIUZ5Q.facebook

Monday, November 11, 2013

Dad. Vietnam.



In remembrance of my father, Veterans' Day 2013

My father, Lt. Col. Browning H. Gorrell, Jr. (USAF ret., deceased) is the focus of my thoughts on this Veterans’ Day, as in many years passed.  Whether or not he was a true “hero” or “highly decorated” is irrelevant from my perspective.  I believe he was, as much as I conflict (or am conflicted with) the idea of war, the military industrial complex, etc.  
I wish I had a copy of his picture, taken during flight training in about 1965, standing proudly posed at the cockpit of his T-38.  He was very trim, not too tall (5’8” in a family of giants well over 6’).  Given the latest in modern weaponry, his stature was not a challenge, no impediment nor handicap.  He had everything it took to be a pilot, and then some.
When I actually did come along, in January, 1966, the sediment which crept under the front door from summer dust storms was replaced with as much snow from a particularly fervent downfall at our home on Reese Air Force Base, Lubbock, Tx.  Not long after that, the newly minted father was enduring survival training, I believe in Washington or Oregon…as close to jungle conditions as available in the continental US.  A call came to the newly minted mother, inquiring as to what my dad’s choice of aircraft was for his pending Vietnam assignment.
As the family lore goes, Mom was confronted with a question where she had no footing for an answer.  This was a question, and a conversation, for Dad.  Dad, however, was totally off the grid, isolated in some moss-covered, hyper-vegetated world for something like 3 weeks, lacking any of the modern means of communication we take so for granted today.
So, as any savvy person, especially a school teacher who needed to learn the ramifications of her very important choice, she began asking questions.  From the very basic, “What are the choices?” (A: F-4 Phantom or C-123 Provider); to, “What are the planes all about?” (A: The Phantom is a front line fighter with heavy armament, ability to carry bombs and strafe.  The C-123 Provider is a cargo plane, hauling all sorts of stuff everywhere).  
Further:  “What about safety?” 
A-1)  The F-4 Phantom flew at Mach 2.23 (close to 1500 mph), at a ceiling of 60,000 feet with an arsenal of “1 x M61 Vulcan 20 mm Gatling cannon and up to 18,650 lbs. of weapons on nine external hardpoints, including air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground missiles, and most types of bombs.” http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/militaryaircraft/p/f4phantomii.htm
A-2) The C-123 Provider was and remains a workhorse for the USAF’s logistics needs, moving people and material everywhere.  The caller, the story goes, let it be known the plane is unarmed yet has an armored cockpit.  It does not engage in combat.  “Non-combat” untangled from military lexicon, and explained in layman longhand, means avoid combat while transporting men, alive and dead, fuel, munitions, vehicles and whatever else needed to go from point A to B, within a combat zone, to the front lines, hot or not, based out of Da Nang. 
 
Faced with this choice, and the known facts, my mother, very pregnant with my little sister, obviously chose the non-combat, armored cockpit aircraft.  My father laughed when he heard her story, agony, and decision.  The “armored cockpit” turned out to be slabs of steel in the crew’s seats, offering real protection only to their respective asses.  He served in Vietnam from January thru December of 1967.  He arrived home to meet his 7 month old daughter for the first time, and in time to celebrate his son’s second birthday.  On January 30, 1968, as Mom was welcoming the 30th year of her life, Da Nang was engulfed in the Tet Offensive, the singular largest military offensive of the war thus far, with the US playing defense against 80,000 plus very angry and committed North Vietnamese and VC.  
“The first wave of attacks began shortly after midnight on 30 January as all five provincial capitals in II Corps and Da Nang, in I Corps, were attacked.”  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tet_Offensive
I only recently, like a few weeks ago, made the connection between Tet and Dad’s deployment in Da Nang.  While watching Full Metal Jacket, there is a scene of “the base” being assaulted during the offensive.  I started to think about the chronology and realized he was either in the middle of it, or very recently departed.
Mind you, Da Nang was not a central part of, nor as severely affected as other cities, during the Tet.  Regardless, Da Nang would be at the very bottom of the list of places I would like to be on January 30-31, 1968.  I watched a video (no audio) of the time before, during, and after the 30th and 31st.  The gist of it is a progression from placid outpost, to full on hot combat zone and the fog of war, to a puppy ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jkKDL4smP4 ). If it wasn’t a focal point of the offensive, I would hate to see, much less be in, what was.  As I learned after a conversation with my mother (fact checking), Dad arrived home on the cusp of the offensive and was saved from the assault.
This is not to say he was too far removed from “the suck”.  I have heard several variants, or pieces parts of what seems to be one story, plus collective memory, but have been foiled in online searches for confirmation of the following.
One story my dad told me was about flying with a “cowboy” pilot whose greatest joy was flying above a river, below tree top level.  The rear cargo door, basically an enormous ramp the size of two garage doors total, was lowered.  Attached to the frame of the aircraft was chain, which attached to heavy duty rope, which, in turn, was attached to a swift boat anchor, a substantial, hooked, chunk of steel.  The goal of this excise was trolling for water craft, i.e. junks.  My father was appalled and angered.
Although I was not able to corroborate the fact online, both my mother and I remember my dad being a recipient of the Distinguished Flying Cross.  I had never heard her story about it until today.  Apparently, in his understated fashion, Dad said they had an award banquet to attend.  He was now in Charleston, SC, soon to embark on the bulk of his career with the C5-A Galaxy.
I’m sure it was full mess-dress.  I’m also sure my mother was outfitted in the best fashion of the time, despite what we might think about it now (love ya, mom).  So the young Captain and his wife did their duty and he received his medal.  No biggie as he played it out.
Over a decade passed before my mother realized the significance of the Cross.  While packing for our departure from Scott AFB, near Belleville, Il., at his retirement, Mom discovered the document which accompanied the award.  It sent her into a tizzie and jives with other stories I had heard from Dad.
Essentially, the document outlined his actions and the events of that day.  He and crew flew a full load of fuel to the front lines, again below tree top level, following the river.  On the trip, they received fire and were hit multiple times.  They flew a second flight, same procedure, same results, yet arriving back at base without having blown up in mid-air.  Incoming tracers (+) 25,000 pounds of fuel (–) any protection from the plane’s skin or framework (=) the likelihood of bad things, very bad things for all aboard.
I remember as a child, amongst all the memorabilia, significant and trivial, mounted on the walls of our home, a relatively small, unadorned plaque.  It was awarded for a “Punctured Provider”.  Obviously, his aircraft was a C-123, aka Provider.  The Punctured bit gave note to the fact he had received fire, with holes in the plane to prove it, but survived.  Dad brushed it off as something that was given him by the guys in his outfit, not a legitimate accommodation.  It isn’t heavy math to think this was in conjunction with the Cross, an award offered on the battlefield, within the squadron, to make light of an otherwise extremely gut wrenching experience.  
Flash forward to 1979.  We lived in O’Fallon, Il.  Dad was stationed at Military Airlift Command Headquarters, Scott AFB, I was 13.  He took me to see Apocalypse Now on the big screen, my first ever R rated movie and the spark for the only real conversation I ever had about the war with my father.
If memory serves, the Iran Hostage situation was in full swing by that point, and I was well aware of a major military base at high alert.  Although I have since studied other instances of such, the state of things on the base was staggering for the young mind.  Even in retrospect, looking at it from on base was more massive than looking at bases post 9/11 from off post.  My mother compared it to the Cuban Missile Crisis.
The flight lines were chockablock full of everything, engines running – fighters, the signature C5s, support vehicles, flight crews… To get on base, something which usually required a flash of military ID for the “parent” / driver, one now had to have their associated, active duty, military spouse meet them at the gate before proceeding to the grocery store.
In the theater, having never been to a movie with only my dad, without Mom and Cis in tow, it was immediately a different experience.  What I saw changed me forever, as did reading George Orwell’s 1984 the previous year in 7th grade.  
There was cussing, subterfuge at the highest levels, much blood, and drugs.  The violence was presented in a way I had never seen before, from the opening scene in the hotel room to the butchering of the water buffalo.  Most riveting, formative, and telling was probably the scene at the bridge where the US builds it every day, the  VC destroy it, and all the while the participants are locked in a, by default, hallucinogenic, totally unimaginable cycle of events.  I was transformed.
Dad was transfixed.  He could not keep his very wide open eyes off the screen.  He seemed clammy, with a hint of perspiration at the brow.  Afterwards, he was a different man, a man I only knew for about half an hour.
He talked about the war, not in depth, but for the only time nonetheless.  He told me about when my sister was born, early morning May 10, 1967, Lakeland, Fl time.  The Red Cross had a very efficient system to alert active duty folks to such events.  Apparently, Dad beat them by several hours, shooting upright in his bunk, in the middle of the night Da Nang time, and announcing proudly, “It’s a girl!” before flopping back to sleep.
Another story was not so cozy.  Dad had always, for good reason, fashioned himself a proficient amateur photographer.  He damn sure acquired the right cameras, mostly in country.  He told me of a crystal clear night, with good light for time lapse shots.  This night, Da Nang was receiving direct hits from incoming mortar fire.  The planes coming and going are likely carrying fuel or ammunition.
A plane had begun its take off.  Along the way, mortars struck the plane and or the runway.  After the crew escaped, thankfully, the whole thing exploded in a multitude of ways, eventually exceeding the runway and penetrating a mine field.  In other words, pyrotechnics for miles.  To bring this particular story to a tight conclusion, I will offer first hand witness of Dad grabbing the kitchen stool, his camera, and taking up watch on top of the station wagon when a tornado warning was issued during our tenure in Oklahoma.  He wanted the shot.  This night on the flight line in Da Nang, he got it.
Back to the thought- I didn’t understand Vietnam when it was happening.  As I became more analytical, as my experience and learning grew, I became increasingly disaffected with the service.   However, I do not want to digress from my account of Dad’s history.
To review:  Dad began to fly, spent time in the war, and returned to do some serious work with cargo planes.  When we moved to Charleston, about 1968, until we moved to Altus, Oklahoma in appx. 1972, Dad progressed thru the C-131 and ultimately to the C5A-Galaxy, the biggest, baddest bird in the sky.
He was trained in Altus, even though still based in Charleston, a member of the 2nd cadre of pilots trained on the new format, a very select crew.  Ultimately, he would go on to help write the manual on C5 operations while at Military Airlift Command, Scott AFB.  He was flying all over the world, gone for weeks at a time, in both planes.  If memory serves, he flew the first C5 to England, from Charleston, met the Queen and showed her the aircraft.  
While still in Charleston, which would be until around 1972, Dad took me, then less than 7 years old, to the flight line one day for a walk thru of his plane.  Prior to this first hand encounter with the largest flying object known to man at the time, I had seen pictures of the C5 with a Volkswagen Beetle parked next to it for scale.  The Bug was about the size of one engine.
The statistics still ring in my head:  wingspan – close to a football field (223’), maximum payload-142 tons, tires – 52, wiring – enough to encircle the globe several times.  The cockpit, the actual experience of sitting in the Captain’s chair was simply overload, an unbelievable myriad of dials, buttons, and monitors.  Standing in the empty cargo area, where Greyhound buses could be stacked two tall and several deep, was akin to looking at the Grand Canyon for the first time.
On another work trip, Dad allowed me to accompany him to the radar station in Altus, OK.  The scene:  my father was, to be objective, a hot commodity coming up through the ranks in the C5 program.  One Saturday morning, after my bowling league, he said we had to swing by “work” for a minute.  “Work”, to me, was the squadron building on the flight line, where we had Christmas parties and I imagined him spending his time while earthbound.  I was between 3rd and 5th grade.
Instead, on a summer day, we traipsed several floors below ground, in an inconspicuous 4 story building, to a very large, very steel door with only a 4”x6” peephole, which was in itself a one way mirror.  A voice came through the grill beneath the apparent mirror, asking for ID to be displayed in the mirror, then password.
To this request for a password, my father replied something like “Christ, Jimmie, just let me in so I can sign form XYZ and be done with it.”  The door swung open.  The room was arrayed with radar monitors and computer equipment (c. 1974) from desk height to ceiling.  I had never seen anything like it and knew the only reason I was allowed in was because I was too young to understand it.  Most present were clad in Bermuda shorts and polo shirts.  I could imagine Hunter S. on duty at such a time.
Here, I will flashback to his early career.  Dad was not originally a pilot, rather a weather person associated with the first space launches.  He would study the conditions and help decide whether or not a launch would be prudent.  He kept his nose for weather his whole life, imparted it to me, which I have imparted to my son.  He would often lament not hanging on to the paper copies of pre-flight clearances for weather, where he and all the original astronauts signed off.  Instead, they were filed in triplicate or pitched.
At one point in Oklahoma, there was a very severe outbreak of tornadoes, second only to the relatively recent outbreak that clobbered Tuscaloosa, Al, Joplin, Mo., etc.  At one point, there were 5 funnel clouds on the ground in our county, and two on the base where we all knew our dads worked.   I had often seen my dad in attack mode- grab the stool, camera, maybe a beverage, go wait for the ultimate twister pic.  This time he was at the flight line.
The elementary school did the unthinkable, closing the school and sending students scurrying in the face of the storms, no duck and cover as was standard operating procedure.   My sister, myself, our friends, headed directly for our house as it was closest to school.  We probably had 10-12 very scared kids hunkered down in the hall during the multiple warnings coming over the radio, with one very nervous woman trying to placate fears.  Mom repeatedly reminded us that our fathers, all of whom were in the same squadron, would sensibly, safely, be in bomb / storm shelters.
That afternoon, the skies turned black and violent, the creek rose at least 10’, and then the sun came out.  Dad pulled in the drive to much celebration.  “You’re alive!” being the common sentiment at home was met with “You wouldn’t believe what I saw!” from the flight line.  He and his comrades were standing on the flight line taking pictures the whole time.  The next day, we visited the flight line, where C5s were spun willy nilly.  Soon, we were presented with 8x10 glossies of the twister from approximately 100 yards away.
My other significant memory from Altus days, probably the first cognizant days of my father’s path and the war, was the return of Vietnam POWs in 1973-75.  I don’t recall the dates, nor do I feel like researching them at this point.  The memory is nevertheless etched in my mind, as crystal clear as any modern means of saving images.
We sat, the four of us, in what had been the garage of our base housing on Lakeshore Drive, Altus AFB.  The “den” was a common style of conversion in which my dad, friends, and myself to a very limited degree, participated.  The scheme was turning at least 2/3rds of the attached garage into living space.  Essentially, it became the TV room.  My participation was mostly plugging in various tools as the “cordless” had yet to arrive.
In this cheaply paneled, yet comfortably outfitted annex, we sat to watch the televised return of POWs.  I can’t remember the year; sources say 1973, gut memory says 1975.  Regardless, we, as a family, watched hundreds of POWs exit planes on the final legs of their transport, on American soil.  My parents were glued to the screen as I have never seen them, before or after.
Among the emaciated, bearded, celebratory survivors were friends. These were friends from pilot training, from all eras pre-war, friends who had been lost for all intents and purposes returning home very much alive.  Later, some of these survivors visited us at home, and the same reactions were universal.  I remember hysterical joy from both parents, tears of relief and latent mourning from Mom and Dad.  This was the first of only two times I ever saw my father cry.  The second, and last, was when his mother died.
Dad’s career continued on the predictable trajectory.  Thru Air War College in 1977/8, and on to MAC Headquarters, at which point, I believe, he did not see any prospect in the requirements for advancement in the services.  At least, he weighed the pluses of continuing vs. the pluses of retirement, at an opportune and necessary point.
Basically, this meant less stick time, more bureaucracy, for exceedingly rapid moves farther abroad in order to climb slowly to General.  He didn't buy it and had a valid out. 
Because of this, the best decision I think my parents ever made, I have known a family “home town”, a place I can claim for generations back, before I started High School.  That in and of itself is a deviation from the military norm which, from my experience, lands families in geography far removed from any historical connection.  Thank God for a family home, and a family I memorialize as good, strong, and moral.
Love ya Dad.  I often wish you were here for counsel.